
I’ve never carried a scale or a tape measure on the river. At one point in my life, when I fished primarily with a single fly rod, I knew the length of the rod butt to the cork and to the stripping guide. Even then, the inconvenience of laying a trout alongside my rod made this process tedious. So I didn’t do it. As far as weighing fish goes, I did have friends who would carry a spring-operated scale in their tackle box. These devices, which clip to the fish’s mouth, seemed inaccurate. Moreover, their use on a lot of two and three pound fish seemed unnecessary.
What is the point of quantifying fish with precision?
There are some situations where it makes sense. As heretical as it may sound to fly fishers, keeping fish is a thing. When one does that, measuring is very important. Regardless of what you think of tournaments, they rely upon numerical record-keeping.
More valid than both of those examples though are the benchmarks of the angling community. Although it is ultimately arbitrary, a 10 pound bass means something. What does “a five pound trout” mean? I am impressed with a 20 pound catfish… but should I be? Don’t some get to be 100 pounds? And circling back to bass: In some California lakes 10-pounders are by-catch. Up north? A 10 pound largemouth isn’t just something. It is legendary.








