
A lot has been written regarding native vs. wild vs. stocked trout. For some reason, people (and even state entities) struggle understanding the differences. Being informed and using the proper words is important. More significant than semantics is appreciating and supporting the science behind the terms.
The native/wild distinction is an invaluable one to make when it comes to conservation. The terms mark the difference between historically present species and those which have been introduced and established. For example, brook trout in an untouched Maine pond are native; brown trout descending from fish that were stocked in Maine 50 years ago are wild.
There are other distinctions to make when speaking of trout populations. Some aren’t as noteworthy when talking about conservation. But they do factor when it comes to the fishing experience.
Not all stocked trout are the same.
“Stocked trout” is treated like a pejorative phrase in many fly fishing circles. Images of hundreds of pounds of fish spilling from a game department truck are borderline pornographic. They are perceived as a distantly second-class fish, and the anglers who target them don’t fare much better.








